![]() |
![]() |
|
Copyright 2007. The Goodfield Institute. The information contained in the article may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without prior written authority of The Goodfield Institute.
Goodfield Institute Top Line Analysis of the Presented by The Goodfield Institute The format of this last Iowa debate precluded extensive interaction between the candidates. Combined with less than aggressive questioning this resulted in a less dynamic and telling debate. Chris Dodd won the debate on a nonverbal level. He came across as energetic, strong, informed, powerful and genuine, with some tears in his eyes. He also displayed good use of his hands. Hillary Clinton came in second place. She proved to be a real powerhouse in this debate. She was informed and focused, with a tendency of pulling her mouth down on both sides, which is a sign of anger and determination. John Edwards came in third place with good use of hands and clear, direct answers. He showed power, yet he was approachable and compassionate. He showed shock through his eyes and a high flutter rate which displays anxiety. Barack Obama came in fourth place. He was clear and strong but unexciting and somewhat flatter than usual. His best response was that he would seek Clinton’s advice “when he is President.” Joe Biden came in fifth place. He came across as clear, direct and informed. His breathing was off (perhaps because of a cold). He was sometimes slick in his responses. Bill Richardson came in sixth place. He had the least amount of “punch” or power. However, he was well-informed, open, persuasive, honest and human. Note: Dennis Kucinich was absent for this debate.
|
The Goodfield Institute
22042 N 64th Avenue • Glendale, AZ 85310
(623) 748-9499